Pain assessment in acute myocardial infarction patients

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0964-3397(95)81693-3Get rights and content

The purpose of this study was to investigate the pain intensity and duration, and to assess the pain control intervention, in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI).

Methods:

Ninety-seven patients (18 diabetics and 79 non-diabetics) admitted to the hospital with chest pain were included in this study. Pain was measured on the numerical rating scale (NRS) 0–10, where 0 means no pain and 10 unbearable pain. All patients were followed for 12 hours, after the last chest pain episode. The data were statistically evaluated with the Student's t-test and chi square (χ2).

Results:

The pain in AMI patients with diabetes mellitus was lower in intensity (P < 0.002) and shorter in duration (P < 0.000) respectively, compared with the non-diabetic AMI patients. The intensity of pain in patients with an anterior infarction tended to be higher (P < 0.03) than in those with an inferior infarction. Finally, the systolic blood pressure fell si gnificantly (P < 0.000) 90 min after admission. No other significant differences were found.

References (29)

  • BradleyRF et al.

    Diminished pain in diabetic patients with myocardial infarction

    Geriatrics

    (1962)
  • ChristensenPD et al.

    Painless myocardial infarction in diabetes melitus

    A myth?

    Danish Medical Bulletin

    (1985)
  • DeedwaniaPC et al.

    Pathophysiology of silent myocardial ischemia during daily life

    Hemodynamic evaluation by simultaneous electrocardiographic and blood pressure monitoring

    Circulation

    (1990)
  • DicksB

    Programmed instruction; cancer pain

    Cancer Nursing

    (1990)
  • Cited by (5)

    • Evaluation of the safety and efficacy of TY-51924 in patients with ST elevated acute myocardial infarction - Early phase II first in patient pilot study

      2016, Journal of Cardiology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Blood samples were measured centrally, and peak values and areas under the curve were calculated. The degree of chest pain before PCI and at the time of first achievement of TIMI 2/3 was evaluated using a numerical rating scale [22]. In addition, any cases of ventricular arrhythmia (NSVT/SVT and Vf/VF) which occurred after study drug administration were recorded.

    • Trial design and rationale of TY-51924 as a novel Na<sup>+</sup>/H<sup>+</sup> exchanger inhibitor in patients with ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention

      2014, Journal of Cardiology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Parameters listed in Table 4 are to be assessed in accordance with the schedule of assessments (Table 2). Then chest pains are to be evaluated using a numerical rating scale [21] and re-admission due to heart failure is diagnosed using the Framingham criteria [22]. Endpoints in this trial are listed in Table 5.

    • What are the long-term results of endoscopic pancreatic sphincterotomy?

      2000, Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
      Citation Excerpt :

      Many patients and physicians are familiar with the NRS where 0 means no pain and 10 means the most severe pain imaginable. The NRS is easy to learn and is thus applicable in assessing a wide variety of medical conditions including myocardial infarction,11 rheumatoid arthritis12 and cancer pain.13 The NRS has been used in the assessment of various pharmacologic13-16 and nonpharmacologic interventions.17

    • Chest pain: If it hurts a lot, is heart attack more likely?

      2016, European Journal of Emergency Medicine
    View full text