Clinical research articleIntensive care nurses’ perceptions of Inter Specialty Trauma Nursing Rounds to improve trauma patient care—A quality improvement project
Introduction
Trauma patients admitted to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) frequently present with complex and clinically challenging care needs including significant life-changing scenarios. The complexity of trauma patients’ injuries requires multiple speciality medical teams to provide specific care (Rose, 2011). Effective communication and inter speciality collaboration is essential to enhance the quality of patient care as the focus needs to be on the patient as a whole and not one aspect of their injury (Costa et al., 2014, O’Leary et al., 2011).
Providing optimum nursing care to complex ICU trauma patients is equally challenging as nurses have varying levels of skill and knowledge. Patient care is contingent upon the nurses’ ability to make effective evidence based clinical decisions (Gardner et al., 2010) and nurses may benefit from support to implement best practice to effectively care for complex trauma patients.
Nursing Rounds provide a process by which patients are discussed on an individual basis to identify challenges and issues. Exchanges of information among team members occur (Catangui and Slark, 2012, Dodek and Raboud, 2003) and educational opportunities within a specific patient context provide meaningful, contemporaneous patient-centred care (Catangui and Slark, 2012, Gardner et al., 2010, Vincent, 2005).
Nursing Rounds have been previously described to consist of nursing specialists from the ward in which the patient resides. Attendees potentially include the nurse in charge, other experienced nurses and direct patient care nurses (Catangui and Slark, 2012, Costa et al., 2014). They have been lauded as effective in instigating changes to ICU patient care (Aitken et al., 2010). Intensive Care nurses and patient care may benefit from drawing on expert nursing knowledge from other areas such as emergency departments, orthopedic units, spinal and trauma services. We have coined these as Inter Specialty Trauma Nursing Rounds (ISTNR), defined as a nursing round with expert specialty nurses from across the hospital together with ICU nurses who collectively discuss the best care options for the trauma patient at the bed-side.
The aim of this study was to improve trauma patient care. ICU direct care nurses’ perceptions of ISTNR was assessed in terms of patient benefits and quantified the subsequent patient care changes.
Section snippets
Method
A Quality Improvement (QI) project was selected as appropriate as these projects focus on site-specific identified issues (Oermann et al., 2014). They aim to improve patient care by staff participation, systematic investigation and measurement of outcomes (Connor, 2014). One method to improve quality in health delivery is the Plan, Do, Study and Act (PDSA) model (Taylor et al., 2014). Taylor et al. (2014) describes PDSA as a four stage cycle that can be used when structuring a study or
Results
One hundred and thirty-two patients were reviewed during 66 ISTNR over a 19-month period during 2012/2013 (see Table 1). The majority of patients were male with a median age of 41 years. Motor vehicle incidents (37.9%) were the main mode of mechanism of injury followed by motorbike incidents.
There were 812 staff attendees at the 66 ISTNR (mean = 11; range 4–20). Attendees included direct care nurses, ICU registered and expert nurses (e.g. Clinical Nurse Consultant and the TCF). Other regular
Discussion
The authors believe these ISTNR, where expert nurses external to the ICU combine with ICU nurses, have not previously been reported. The study’s results demonstrated the benefits of inter specialty nursing collaboration in this setting as perceived by direct care nurses and the changes to patient care. As a Magnet hospital the nurse-led ISTNR embodies the Magnet model of exemplary professional practice and to improve patient outcomes (A New Model for ANCC’s Magnet Recognition Program, 2015).
Conclusion
The complexity of caring for high acuity trauma patients in ICU is undeniably challenging; innovative and flexible ideas are needed to improve nursing care. ISTNR are suggested as an innovative nurse- led QI to enhance nurse knowledge in trauma patient care. ISTNR utilized expert nursing knowledge from specialty nurses both internal and external to ICU. The benefits of ISTNR were clear with a collegial forum and collaborative team environment in which nurses shared their knowledge and skills.
Conflict of interest
Author confirms there are no known conflicts of interest associated with this manuscript and there are no financial disclosures associated with this manuscript.
Ethical statement
Participation in Nursing Rounds was routine practice in the study site. The focus on trauma patients was deemed within usual practice parameters. No identifying data were collected on patients or staff attending ISTNR or via the evaluation survey. Consent was implied if the staff completed the anonymous evaluation surveys.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank the staff in the Princess Alexandra Hospital Intensive Care Unit for all the support provided. We also would like to thank the nursing staff external the Intensive Care Unit who participated in this quality improvement project.
References (36)
- et al.
Nurses perceived benefits of trauma nursing rounds (TNR) on clinical practice in an Australian emergency department: a mixed method study
Aust. Emerg. Nurs.
(2015) - et al.
Innovation in clinical learning for the acute hospital environment: nursing grand rounds
Nurs. Educ. Today.
(2010) - et al.
Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness
Nurs. Educ. Today
(2004) Motivation and adult learning: a survey among hospital personnel attending a CPR course
Resuscitation
(2008)- et al.
Nursing grand rounds: a strategy for promoting evidence—based learning among pediatric nurses
J. Pediatr. Nurs.
(2015) - et al.
Early management of the severely injured major trauma patient
Br. J. Anaesth.
(2014) - A New Model for ANCC’s Magnet Recognition Program, 2008....
- et al.
The impact of nursing rounds on the practice environment and nurse satisfaction in the intensive care unit: pre-test and post-test comparative study
Int. J. Nurs. Stud.
(2010) - et al.
Bedside teaching in the emergency department
Acad. Emerg. Med.
(2006) - et al.
Analysis data in qualitative research.