Clinical research article
Intensive care nurses’ perceptions of Inter Specialty Trauma Nursing Rounds to improve trauma patient care—A quality improvement project

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iccn.2017.01.002Get rights and content

Highlights

  • ISTNR utilizes expert nursing knowledge in managing trauma patient care.

  • ISTNR provide individualised bed-side education for nursing staff in the care of trauma patients.

  • ISTNR improved inter-departmental collaboration around trauma patient care.

  • Changes to trauma patient care was directly due to ISTNR.

Abstract

Background

Trauma patient management is complex and challenging for nurses in the Intensive Care Unit. One strategy to promote quality and evidence based care may be through utilising specialty nursing experts both internal and external to the Intensive Care Unit in the form of a nursing round. Inter Specialty Trauma Nursing Rounds have the potential to improve patient care, collaboration and nurses’ knowledge.

Objectives

The purpose of this quality improvement project was to improve trauma patient care and evaluate the nurses perception of improvement.

Methods

The project included structured, weekly rounds that were conducted at the bedside. Nursing experts and others collaborated to assess and make changes to trauma patients’ care. The rounds were evaluated to assess the nurse’s perception of improvement.

Results

There were 132 trauma patients assessed. A total of 452 changes to patient care occurred. On average, three changes per patient resulted. Changes included nursing management, medical management and wound care. Nursing staff reported an overall improvement of trauma patient care, trauma knowledge, and collaboration with colleagues.

Conclusions

Inter Specialty Trauma Nursing Rounds utilizes expert nursing knowledge. They are suggested as an innovative way to address the clinical challenges of caring for trauma patients and are perceived to enhance patient care and nursing knowledge.

Introduction

Trauma patients admitted to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) frequently present with complex and clinically challenging care needs including significant life-changing scenarios. The complexity of trauma patients’ injuries requires multiple speciality medical teams to provide specific care (Rose, 2011). Effective communication and inter speciality collaboration is essential to enhance the quality of patient care as the focus needs to be on the patient as a whole and not one aspect of their injury (Costa et al., 2014, O’Leary et al., 2011).

Providing optimum nursing care to complex ICU trauma patients is equally challenging as nurses have varying levels of skill and knowledge. Patient care is contingent upon the nurses’ ability to make effective evidence based clinical decisions (Gardner et al., 2010) and nurses may benefit from support to implement best practice to effectively care for complex trauma patients.

Nursing Rounds provide a process by which patients are discussed on an individual basis to identify challenges and issues. Exchanges of information among team members occur (Catangui and Slark, 2012, Dodek and Raboud, 2003) and educational opportunities within a specific patient context provide meaningful, contemporaneous patient-centred care (Catangui and Slark, 2012, Gardner et al., 2010, Vincent, 2005).

Nursing Rounds have been previously described to consist of nursing specialists from the ward in which the patient resides. Attendees potentially include the nurse in charge, other experienced nurses and direct patient care nurses (Catangui and Slark, 2012, Costa et al., 2014). They have been lauded as effective in instigating changes to ICU patient care (Aitken et al., 2010). Intensive Care nurses and patient care may benefit from drawing on expert nursing knowledge from other areas such as emergency departments, orthopedic units, spinal and trauma services. We have coined these as Inter Specialty Trauma Nursing Rounds (ISTNR), defined as a nursing round with expert specialty nurses from across the hospital together with ICU nurses who collectively discuss the best care options for the trauma patient at the bed-side.

The aim of this study was to improve trauma patient care. ICU direct care nurses’ perceptions of ISTNR was assessed in terms of patient benefits and quantified the subsequent patient care changes.

Section snippets

Method

A Quality Improvement (QI) project was selected as appropriate as these projects focus on site-specific identified issues (Oermann et al., 2014). They aim to improve patient care by staff participation, systematic investigation and measurement of outcomes (Connor, 2014). One method to improve quality in health delivery is the Plan, Do, Study and Act (PDSA) model (Taylor et al., 2014). Taylor et al. (2014) describes PDSA as a four stage cycle that can be used when structuring a study or

Results

One hundred and thirty-two patients were reviewed during 66 ISTNR over a 19-month period during 2012/2013 (see Table 1). The majority of patients were male with a median age of 41 years. Motor vehicle incidents (37.9%) were the main mode of mechanism of injury followed by motorbike incidents.

There were 812 staff attendees at the 66 ISTNR (mean = 11; range 4–20). Attendees included direct care nurses, ICU registered and expert nurses (e.g. Clinical Nurse Consultant and the TCF). Other regular

Discussion

The authors believe these ISTNR, where expert nurses external to the ICU combine with ICU nurses, have not previously been reported. The study’s results demonstrated the benefits of inter specialty nursing collaboration in this setting as perceived by direct care nurses and the changes to patient care. As a Magnet hospital the nurse-led ISTNR embodies the Magnet model of exemplary professional practice and to improve patient outcomes (A New Model for ANCC’s Magnet Recognition Program, 2015).

Conclusion

The complexity of caring for high acuity trauma patients in ICU is undeniably challenging; innovative and flexible ideas are needed to improve nursing care. ISTNR are suggested as an innovative nurse- led QI to enhance nurse knowledge in trauma patient care. ISTNR utilized expert nursing knowledge from specialty nurses both internal and external to ICU. The benefits of ISTNR were clear with a collegial forum and collaborative team environment in which nurses shared their knowledge and skills.

Conflict of interest

Author confirms there are no known conflicts of interest associated with this manuscript and there are no financial disclosures associated with this manuscript.

Ethical statement

Participation in Nursing Rounds was routine practice in the study site. The focus on trauma patients was deemed within usual practice parameters. No identifying data were collected on patients or staff attending ISTNR or via the evaluation survey. Consent was implied if the staff completed the anonymous evaluation surveys.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the staff in the Princess Alexandra Hospital Intensive Care Unit for all the support provided. We also would like to thank the nursing staff external the Intensive Care Unit who participated in this quality improvement project.

References (36)

  • Catangui et al.

    Nurse-led ward rounds: a valuable contribution to acute stroke care

    Br. J. Nurs.

    (2012)
  • B. Connor

    Differentiating research, evidence-based practice, and quality improvement

    Am. Nurse Today

    (2014)
  • D.K. Costa et al.

    Facilitators of an interprofessional approach to care in medical and mixed medical/surgical ICUs: a multicentre qualitative study

    Res. Nurs. Health

    (2014)
  • J.W. Creswell

    Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches

    (2009)
  • L. Crossan et al.

    Nursing challenges with a severely injured patient in critical care

    Nurs. Crit. Care

    (2013)
  • L. DeSantis et al.

    The concept of theme as used in qualitative nursing research

    WJNR

    (2000)
  • P.M. Dodek et al.

    Explicit approach to rounds in an ICU improves communication and satisfaction of providers

    Intensive Care Med.

    (2003)
  • P. Frakes

    Effective teamwork in trauma management

    Emerg. Nurs.

    (2009)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text