Intensive and Critical Care Nursing
Volume 25, Issue 5 , Pages 258-267, October 2009

To return or to discard? Randomised trial on gastric residual volume management

  • Maria-Eulàlia Juvé-Udina

      Affiliations

    • IDIBELL, Catalan Institute of Health, Gran Via de les Corts Catalanes, 587, Barcelona 08007, Spain
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +34 675786360; fax: +34 934824205.
  • ,
  • Consol Valls-Miró

      Affiliations

    • IDIBELL, Bellvitge University Hospital, ICU 2-1, Feixa Llarga s/n, 08907 Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain
  • ,
  • Avelina Carreño-Granero

      Affiliations

    • IDIBELL, Bellvitge University Hospital, ICU 2-1, Feixa Llarga s/n, 08907 Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain
  • ,
  • Gemma Martinez-Estalella

      Affiliations

    • IDIBELL, Bellvitge University Hospital, ICU 2-1, Feixa Llarga s/n, 08907 Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain
  • ,
  • David Monterde-Prat

      Affiliations

    • IDIBELL, Catalan Institute of Health, Gran Via de les Corts Catalanes, 587, Barcelona 08007, Spain
  • ,
  • Carmen-Maria Domingo-Felici

      Affiliations

    • IDIBELL, Bellvitge University Hospital, ICU 2-1, Feixa Llarga s/n, 08907 Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain
  • ,
  • Joan Llusa-Finestres

      Affiliations

    • IDIBELL, Bellvitge University Hospital, ICU 2-1, Feixa Llarga s/n, 08907 Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain
  • ,
  • Gemma Asensio-Malo

      Affiliations

    • IDIBELL, Bellvitge University Hospital, ICU 2-1, Feixa Llarga s/n, 08907 Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain

Accepted 15 June 2009.

Summary 

Background

The control of gastric residual volume (GRV) is a common nursing intervention in intensive care; however the literature shows a wide variation in clinical practice regarding the management of GRV, potentially affecting patients’ clinical outcomes.

The aim of this study is to determine the effect of returning or discarding GRV, on gastric emptying delays and feeding, electrolyte and comfort outcomes in critically ill patients.

Method

A randomised, prospective, clinical trial design was used to study 125 critically ill patients, assigned to the return or the discard group. Main outcome measure was delayed gastric emptying. Feeding outcomes were determined measuring intolerance indicators, feeding delays and feeding potential complications. Fluid and electrolyte measures included serum potassium, glycaemia control and fluid balance. Discomfort was identified by significant changes in vital signs.

Results

Patients in both groups presented similar mean GRV with no significant differences found (p=0.111), but participants in the intervention arm showed a lower incidence and severity of delayed gastric emptying episodes (p=0.001). No significant differences were found for the rest of outcome measurements, except for hyperglycaemia.

Conclusions

The results of this study support the recommendation to reintroduce gastric content aspirated to improve GRV management without increasing the risk for potential complications.

Keywords: Gastric residual volume, Nasogastric tube, Critical care, Clinical trial, Nursing

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 12.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0964-3397(09)00058-5

doi:10.1016/j.iccn.2009.06.004

Intensive and Critical Care Nursing
Volume 25, Issue 5 , Pages 258-267, October 2009