Advertisement
Journal Home
Search for

Volume 25, Issue 4, Pages 208-213 (August 2009)


View previous. 6 of 9 View next.

Patients’ perception of music versus ordinary sound in a postanaesthesia care unit: A randomised crossover trial

Ann-Charlotte Fredrikssonab, Leif Hellströmb, Ulrica NilssoncCorresponding Author Informationemail address

Accepted 6 April 2009.

Summary 

We performed an experimental single-blind crossover design study in a postanaesthesia care unit (PACU): (i) to test the hypothesis that patients will experience a higher degree of wellbeing if they listen to music compared to ordinary PACU sounds during their early postoperative care, (ii) to determine if there is a difference over time, and (iii) to evaluate the importance of the acoustic environment and whether patients prefer listening to music during their stay. Two groups received a three-phase intervention: one group (n=23) experienced music–ordinary sound–music and the second group (n=21) experienced ordinary sound–music–ordinary sound. Each period lasted 30min, and after each period the patients assessed their experience of the sound. The results demonstrated a significant difference (p<0.001) between groups in the proportions of patients reporting that the acoustic environment was of great importance for their wellbeing during the three-phase intervention, and most participants (n=36 versus n=8) noticed that they were exposed to different sounds during the PACU period. The results also revealed that most participants (n=32) preferred listening to music versus listening to ordinary sound (n=3) while in the PACU (p<0.001). These findings promote use of listening to music to establish a healing environment for patients in a postanaesthesia care unit.

a Dep. Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Malmoe University Hospital, Sweden

b Faculty of Health and Society, Department of Nursing, Malmö University, Sweden

c Dep. Anesthesia and Intensive Care/Centre for Health Care Sciences, Örebro University Hospital, P.O. Box 1324, SE-70113 Örebro, Sweden

Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +46 19 60 28 44; fax: +46 19 611 38 18.

PII: S0964-3397(09)00029-9

doi:10.1016/j.iccn.2009.04.002


View previous. 6 of 9 View next.

Advertisement