Intensive and Critical Care Nursing
Volume 22, Issue 5 , Pages 274-282, October 2006

An evaluation of an early warning clinical marker referral tool

  • Anna Louise Green

      Affiliations

    • Western Hospital, Gordon Street, Footscray, 3011, Vic., Australia
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +61 3 8345 6588; fax: +61 3 8345 6336.
  • ,
  • Allison Williams

      Affiliations

    • University of Melbourne, Vic., Australia

Accepted 23 April 2006.

Summary 

Objectives

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the introduction of a clinical marker tool using a pre- and post-test design in a tertiary university-affiliated hospital. The clinical marker tool was designed to assist in the early identification of unstable patients in the general surgical and medical ward environment based on abnormal vital signs.

Methods

A pre- and post-test design of the clinical marker tool was undertaken over a 3-year period. All unstable ward patients who were admitted to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) from 1 February 2002 to 31 January 2003 (pre- implementation period) and from 1 February 2003 to 31 January 2005 (post-implementation period) were included in the study. A secondary analysis was performed on annual medical emergency calls made to the resuscitation team and mortality from such events from 1 January 2002 to 31 December 2004.

Results

Prior to implementing the clinical marker tool, 63 (41.2%) unplanned ICU admissions from the ward had clinical markers present for ≥6h. Following implementation of the clinical marker tool, 101 (24.5%) patients had clinical markers present for ≥6h (p=0.0002). There was no difference in ICU or hospital length of stay or hospital mortality for unplanned admissions to the ICU following implementation of the clinical marker tool. The number of patients found to be still breathing with a pulse on arrival of the resuscitation team was significantly increased from 56 (47.9%) patients to 181 (64.6%) patients post-implementation of the clinical marker tool (p=0.0024). Additionally, we found an associated increase in survival of this group of patients discharged home from 33 (59%) patients to 136 (75.1%) patients post-implementation of the clinical marker tool (p=0.0003).

Conclusions

The clinical marker tool implemented by an ICU Liaison Team improved the management of patients in the ward environment, including proactive admission of patients to the ICU. Additionally, implementation of the clinical marker tool was associated with a reduction in the number of cardiac arrests and improvement in hospital mortality for patients experiencing a medical emergency call. The timeframe of instability on the ward prior to the ICU admission may be used as a quality indicator to measure ICU Liaison Team performance. Further research is required to substantiate these findings.

Keywords: Critical Care, Early warning scores, Unplanned ICU admission, Critical Illness mortality

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 12.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0964-3397(06)00068-1

doi:10.1016/j.iccn.2006.04.004

Intensive and Critical Care Nursing
Volume 22, Issue 5 , Pages 274-282, October 2006