Intensive and Critical Care Nursing
Volume 22, Issue 1 , Pages 32-39, February 2006

Use of a Behavioural Pain Scale to assess pain in ventilated, unconscious and/or sedated patients

  • Jeanne Young

      Affiliations

    • Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Centre for Nursing Research, Hospital Avenue, Nedlands, WA 6009, Australia
    • Edith Cowan University, Australia
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +61 8 9346 2561; fax: +61 8 9346 4965.
  • ,
  • Jo Siffleet

      Affiliations

    • Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Centre for Nursing Research, Hospital Avenue, Nedlands, WA 6009, Australia
  • ,
  • Sue Nikoletti

      Affiliations

    • Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Centre for Nursing Research, Hospital Avenue, Nedlands, WA 6009, Australia
    • Edith Cowan University, Australia
  • ,
  • Thérèse Shaw

      Affiliations

    • Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Centre for Nursing Research, Hospital Avenue, Nedlands, WA 6009, Australia
    • Edith Cowan University, Australia

Accepted 26 April 2005.

Summary 

Current empirical evidence supports claims that pain in sedated, unconscious Intensive Care Unit (ICU) patients is underrated and under-treated. Given the severity of ICU patients’ illness pain management, whilst important, may not be considered a priority and therefore can be easily overlooked. The aim of this study was to validate the Behavioural Pain Scale (BPS) for the assessment of pain in critically ill patients by evaluating facial expressions, upper limb movements and compliance with mechanical ventilation.

Methods

A prospective, descriptive repeated measures study design was used to assess the validity and reliability of the BPS for assessing pain in critically ill patients undergoing routine painful (repositioning) and non-painful (eye care) procedures.

Results

An average of 73% of BPS scores increased (indicating pain) after patients were repositioned, as opposed to 14% after eye care. This increase was statistically significant for repositioning (p<0.003) but not for eye care (p>0.3). The odds of an increase in BPS between pre- and post-procedure assessments was more than 25 times higher for repositioning compared with eye care (p<0.0001), after controlling for analgesics and sedatives.

Conclusion

The BPS was found to be a valid and reliable tool in the assessment of pain in the unconscious sedated patient. Results also highlighted that traditional pain indicators, such as fluctuations in haemodynamic parameters, are not always an accurate measure for the assessment of pain in unconscious patients and as such more objective pain assessment measures are essential. Finally, further validation of the BPS and identification of other painful routine procedures is needed to enhance pain management delivery for unconscious patients.

Keywords: Pain, ICU, Pain assessment, Pain behaviours, Critically ill, Pain tools

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 12.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0964-3397(05)00061-3

doi:10.1016/j.iccn.2005.04.004

Intensive and Critical Care Nursing
Volume 22, Issue 1 , Pages 32-39, February 2006